Thinking a lot about newsroom work flow recently, mostly in connection with this reorganization think tank project going on at my paper, I just wanted to map out the most basic of work flow models. It’s nothing new, but it seems like every conversation about newsroom operation would be easier if we all had our basics straight.
For example, everyone always talks like the internet makes things so much more confusing. It’s really the exact same flow, just with different tasks at the Producer step. The roles here are the basic archetypes, the essential components of getting news content to the public. Each role is not necessarily designated to one person, as the Position example illustrates. Five or six different people may be involved in the editor role for a single piece of content; conversely, a single person could fill all the roles, like when I publish something journalism-like here on my blog.
This chart is hardly comprehensive. It doesn’t even indicate deadlines, let alone all the decisions and routines established in a newsroom work flow. The point is to get everyone thinking in the same framework to further discussion about how newsrooms can be more efficient and integrate multiple platforms.


9 comments
Comments feed for this article
July 15, 2008 at 6:23 pm
Newsroom organization: Back to basics « Stories on the run
[...] under: Journalism, News Industry Seriously, this is what the newspaper industry needs to see. Lisa breaks down the content workflow of print journalism beautifully in on her blog. It’s simple, and it’s how newspapers, [...]
July 15, 2008 at 11:34 pm
links for 2008-07-15 | James Mitchell
[...] Newsroom work flow: back to basics “The roles here are the basic archetypes, the essential components of getting news content to the public.” (tags: journalism work newsroom newspaper+websites) [...]
July 17, 2008 at 12:44 am
Wenalway
Editor = editing. Good Charlotte, you’ve hit upon something!
How are you not running some newspaper or some think tank somewhere?
Young journos — they’re entertaining when they try to sound smart.
July 17, 2008 at 1:38 am
Lisa Waananen
Hey, I called it “back to basics” for a reason. If you have a better word to sum up what an editor does I’d be glad to hear it.
Otherwise, I’m not too interested in your generic “young journos” bashing. I wish I could send the same “entertaining when trying to sound smart” bit back to you, but it just wouldn’t be honest.
By all means stick around if you want to be constructive, otherwise I’ll get the honor of joining every journlism site ever in the No Wenalway Allowed Club.
July 19, 2008 at 6:33 pm
Wenalway
The fact you’re even trying to debate this speaks volumes.
Young journos — they’re entertaining when they try to defend their shallow positions.
July 19, 2008 at 11:25 pm
tor
Tee hee. “Good Charlotte” reminds me of that God-awful band.
July 20, 2008 at 1:31 am
Jay Rosen
I don’t get the “community” line in your chart. But keep doing this kind of thing, please. Cheers.
July 20, 2008 at 4:02 am
Lisa Waananen
The community part was just to show that reporters don’t conjure their stories from nothing. It’s a part of the journalism process (arguably the most important part) but not within the bounds of the industry, so it got a little unwieldy in the other categories.
I toyed with the idea of making it a circle, with the process both starting and ending with “community.” It ended up sounding too tricky, but maybe I’ll try it again.
July 20, 2008 at 4:50 am
Jay Rosen
Okay, I got that. But…. the community’s “action” is “happening?” Doesn’t scan. Check this chart out. Not the same but let’s say the same neightborhood:
http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/04/14/the-press-becomes-the-press-sphere/